§

Sears Roebuck De Puerto Rico, Inc.

284 N.L.R.B. 258 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Sears Roebuck De Puerto Rico, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. First Union Management, Inc.

    777 F.2d 330 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 18 times
    Serving as a "lead man" with authority to make "routine assignment of tasks to others does not elevate an employee to supervisory status"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dillon Stores

    643 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 1981)   Cited 21 times
    Finding that the employer's proffer of "a flimsy or unsupported explanation may affirmatively suggest that the employer has seized upon a pretext to mask an antiunion motivation"

  4. George C. Foss Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    752 F.2d 1407 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 16 times
    Finding an issue fully and fairly litigated in part because there was an opportunity for cross-examination

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Broyhill Company

    514 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 25 times
    In Broyhill, the Eighth Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that McWilliams was a supervisor.

  6. Betts Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times

    No. 8813. May 26, 1967. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., Charles N. Henson, Peter F. Caldwell, R. Austin Northern, Roscoe E. Long and Brock R. Snyder, Topeka, Kan., on brief), for petitioner. Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, HICKEY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge

  7. Certainteed Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    714 F.2d 1042 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    In Certainteed Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 714 F.2d 1042, 1052-1060 (11th Cir. 1983), the court approved both Midland and its general retroactive application, but balked at resolving whether to apply the doctrine retroactively to the case before it, which had been decided by the Board under the Hollywood Ceramics/General Knit standard.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J-Wood/A Tappan Division

    720 F.2d 309 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times
    Remanding for a hearing where, although not yet proven, the employer's evidence demonstrated that a “union agent” might have threatened employees' jobs prior to an election

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Campbell Products Dept

    623 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    In Campbell Products we acknowledged that the Board had discretion to interpret those rules as requiring strict compliance.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. McEver Engineering, Inc.

    784 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that "[b]efore an employer can be said to have discriminated against its employees for their protected activity, the Board must show that the supervisor responsible for the alleged discriminatory action knew about the" union activity