§

Sean Combs v. All Surface Entertainment, Inc.

No. 92051490 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 5, 2012)
Sean Combs v. All Surface Entertainment, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Natural Answers v. Smithkline Beecham

    529 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that a FDUTPA claim premised on the infringement of a trademark or trade dress "rises or falls on the success" of the underlying claims

  2. Imperial Tobacco v. Philip Morris, Inc.

    899 F.2d 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 86 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that promotional use of a mark on “incidental products” like whiskey, pens, watches, sunglasses, and food did not constitute use of mark for cigarettes

  3. Crash Dummy v. Mattel

    601 F.3d 1387 (Fed. Cir. 2010)   Cited 28 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that we "review[] [the TTAB's] evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion"

  4. Cerveceria Centroamericana v. Cerveceria

    892 F.2d 1021 (Fed. Cir. 1989)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in the absence of evidence of intent to resume use during the period of non-use, the TTAB "may conclude the registrant has . . . failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment," even when there is evidence of intent to resume after the period of nonuse

  5. Rivard v. Linville

    133 F.3d 1446 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 23 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding evidence must be more than a mere denial of an intent to abandon

  6. Miller Brewing Co. v. Oland's Breweries [1971] Ltd.

    548 F.2d 349 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Considering evidence beyond a statutory period to affirm the Board's decision to sustain opposition to a trademark application

  7. Ithaca Industries v. Essence Communications, Inc.

    706 F. Supp. 1195 (W.D.N.C. 1986)   Cited 6 times

    No. ST-C-83-242. June 23, 1986. Judgment September 4, 1986. Susan F. Olive, Olive and Olive, Durham, N.C., for plaintiff. George L. Little, Jr., Winston-Salem, N.C., Steven D. Hoffman, New York City, for defendants. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION WOODROW WILSON JONES, District Judge. The Plaintiff, Ithaca Industries, Inc. (Ithaca), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in the Western District of North Carolina at North Wilkesboro brought this action against the Defendants, Essence Communications

  8. Poncy v. Johnson Johnson

    460 F. Supp. 795 (D.N.J. 1978)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. Nos. 76-1150, 77-703. May 18, 1978. Carella, Bain, Gilfillan Rhodes, P.A., Newark, N.J., for plaintiffs; Smathers Thompson by G. Morton Good, Miami, Fla., of counsel. Smith, Statton, Wise Heher by Arthur S. Lane, Princeton, N.J., for defendant; Patterson, Belknap, Webb Tyler by Thomas C. Morrison and Russell C. Deyo, New York City, of counsel. OPINION BIUNNO, District Judge. In these consolidated cases, Johnson Johnson asserts counterclaims against plaintiffs in connection with a trademark dispute

  9. Mission Dry Corp. v. Seven-Up Co.

    193 F.2d 201 (C.C.P.A. 1951)   Cited 4 times

    Patent Appeals No. 5826. December 18, 1951. Albert J. Fihe, Burbank, Cal. (Munson H. Lane, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. John H. Cassidy, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, JOHNSON, and WORLEY, Judges. JACKSON, Judge. On May 2, 1938, appellant filed its application, serial No. 405,933 to register the trade-mark "Charge Up" as applied to non-alcoholic, maltless beverages used as soft drinks, together with syrups and extracts for preparing

  10. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,882 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  11. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,015 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  12. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,599 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"