§

Seacret Spa International LTD

No. 78811559re (T.T.A.B. Jan. 22, 2015)
Seacret Spa International LTD

6 Cited authorities

  1. Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems

    223 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 78 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the same cause of action can exist in two cases only where the same set of transactional facts are involved in those cases and that, where the transactional facts differ, the doctrine of claim preclusion does not apply

  2. Levi Strauss & Co. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.

    719 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 28 times
    Recognizing that voluntary dismissal with prejudice does not have issue preclusive effect

  3. Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Disney Enters., Inc.

    702 F.3d 640 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 9 times

    No. 2011–1593. 2012-12-21 STEPHEN SLESINGER, INC., Appellant, v. DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee. Roger L. Zissu, Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., of New York, N.Y. argued for appellant. With him on the brief were David Donahue and Michael Chiappetta. Of counsel was Richard Z. Lehv. Daniel M. Petrocelli, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Cassandra L. Seto; and Mark E. Miller, of San Francisco, CA. RADER Roger L. Zissu, Fross Zelnick

  4. In re Bose Corp.

    476 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing in the context of administrative proceedings that courts should "exercise caution in applying claim preclusion in an ex parte proceeding"

  5. Application of Orion Research Inc.

    669 F.2d 689 (C.C.P.A. 1980)   Cited 2 times

    Appeal No. 79-622. April 10, 1980. John B. Miller, Cambridge, Mass., attorney of record for appellant; Robert W. Hagopian, Cambridge, Mass., of counsel. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred E. McKelvey and David E. Shallant, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and MILLER, Judges, and FORD, Judge, Customs Court. Honorable Morgan Ford, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting

  6. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,585 times   271 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"