Scott Glass Products, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 times
Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.
397 U.S. 913 (1970) Cited 224 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]here can be no question that a person `endeavors' to obstruct justice when he arranges to have a prospective government witness murdered."
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
Gordon v. United States
383 F.2d 936 (D.C. Cir. 1967) Cited 530 times
Holding that convictions that are for the same crime should be admitted sparingly
Central Hardware Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
407 U.S. 539 (1972) Cited 142 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot
Dyer v. MacDougall
201 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 321 times
Holding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence
L'Eggs Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
619 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 37 times
Finding that statement of anti-union motive eliminates question concerning validity of proffered legitimate reason for adverse action
United States v. McLister
608 F.2d 785 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 30 times
Concluding that a conviction for possessing marijuana should not be used to convict the defendant for distribution of cocaine because it has "little probative value . . . to prove any of the purposes listed in Rule 404(b)"

Scott Glass Products, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that "[t]here can be no question that a person `endeavors' to obstruct justice when he arranges to have a prospective government witness murdered."

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Holding that convictions that are for the same crime should be admitted sparingly

Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot

Holding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence

Finding that statement of anti-union motive eliminates question concerning validity of proffered legitimate reason for adverse action

Concluding that a conviction for possessing marijuana should not be used to convict the defendant for distribution of cocaine because it has "little probative value . . . to prove any of the purposes listed in Rule 404(b)"