Schultz Painting & Decorating Co.

Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 328 times 1 Legal Analyses
Emphasizing that the Board's remedial power "is not limited to the illustrative example of one type of permissible affirmative order," such as backpay, and cautioning that the "particular means by which the effects of unfair labor practices are to be expunged are matters 'for the Board not the courts to determine'" (first citing Phelps Dodge, 313 U.S. at 187, 189; then quoting Machinists, 311 U.S. at 82)
N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.
311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 71 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
United States v. Heap
345 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 22 times
No. 383, Docket 29426. Argued March 17, 1965. Decided May 4, 1965. Daniel R. Murdock, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., and Bernard W. Nassbaum, Asst. U.S. Atty., Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, on the brief), for appellee. Leon B. Polsky, New York City (Anthony F. Marra, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Chief Judge: John Heap appeals his conviction and five-year sentence