§

Schuckman Press, Inc.

172 N.L.R.B. 2200 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Schuckman Press, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Colecraft Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    385 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    In Colecraft, supra, two supervisors were discussing the effect of unionization when they were overheard by passing employees.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Richman Brothers Company

    387 F.2d 809 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 3 times

    No. 16159. December 13, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard Adelman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank C. Heath, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent, Jones, Day, Cockley Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and CASTLE and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. National Labor Relations Board petitions pursuant to

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Mead Foods, Inc.

    353 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 1 times

    No. 22013. December 1, 1965. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Allen M. Hutter, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jerome W. Johnson, Amarillo, Tex., for respondent, Underwood, Wilson, Sutton, Heare Berry, Amarillo, Tex., of counsel. Before JONES, Senior Judge, and GEWIN and BELL, Circuit Judges. Of the Court of Claims, sitting by designation