Schnelli Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Cellar Restaurant

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 times
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
N.L.R.B. v. Pacific Grinding Wheel Co., Inc.
572 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 45 times
In Pacific Grinding Wheel, the court recognized that "Board disapproval of proposed terms," "a company's adamant insistence on strong pro-management terms," and "rejection by the employer of terms which were in a previous contract" are not sufficient in themselves to establish bad faith, but are factors which may be considered by the Board with other evidence, and that the "totality of the circumstances may justify a finding of failure to bargain in good faith."
Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B
427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970) Cited 47 times
No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. N.L.R.B
560 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 32 times
Applying Medo to find that employer violated Act by meeting directly with employees to discuss increases in their seniority
J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
623 F.2d 322 (4th Cir. 1980) Cited 12 times
Determining that the Board had not sufficiently explained itself where it was “difficult to ascertain ... why the Board apparently departed from its precedents”
N.L.R.B. v. Lee Office Equipment
572 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 12 times
In NLRB v. Lee Office Equipment, 572 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1978), the court was asked to exempt an employer refusal to bargain during the certification year because the union had allegedly not only lost its majority status but had done so as a result of its own misconduct.

Schnelli Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Cellar Restaurant

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

Brooks v. Labor Board

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

N.L.R.B. v. Pacific Grinding Wheel Co., Inc.

Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Applying Medo to find that employer violated Act by meeting directly with employees to discuss increases in their seniority

J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Determining that the Board had not sufficiently explained itself where it was “difficult to ascertain ... why the Board apparently departed from its precedents”

N.L.R.B. v. Lee Office Equipment

In NLRB v. Lee Office Equipment, 572 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1978), the court was asked to exempt an employer refusal to bargain during the certification year because the union had allegedly not only lost its majority status but had done so as a result of its own misconduct.