§

Schneider's Dairy, Inc.

248 N.L.R.B. 1093 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Schneider's Dairy, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  2. ARO, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    596 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1979)   Cited 33 times
    In ARO, Inc. v. NLRB, 596 F.2d 713, 718 (6th Cir. 1979), this court held, "For an individual claim or complaint to amount to concerted action under the Act it must... be made with the object of inducing or preparing for group action...."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Buddies Supermarkets, Inc.

    481 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 34 times
    In Buddies Supermarkets, employee Smith was discharged for causing dissention among his co-workers after failing to gain a more favorable contract for himself. The ALJ held that the employee was discharged for engaging in section 7 protected concerted activity, and the Board affirmed.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Northern Metal Company

    440 F.2d 881 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 34 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Northern Metal Company, 440 F.2d at 884-85, the Court, branding the finding of "constructive concerted activity" in Interboro as a pure "legal fiction," said it was "unwilling to adopt such a fiction.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    190 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 52 times

    No. 21395. Argued June 14, 1951. Decided July 13, 1951. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and FRANK and L. HAND, Circuit Judges. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for the respondent. L. HAND, Circuit Judge. By a divided vote we decided this appeal last year upon the same record that is now before us, holding that the Board's order should be "enforced." The Supreme Court vacated our order and remanded the cause to us for reconsideration in two

  6. N.L.R.B. v. John Langenbacher Co.

    398 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 10 times
    In NLRB v. John Langenbacher Co., 398 F.2d 459, 463 (1968), it held that an attempt by employees to enforce their understanding of a collective bargaining agreement is a protected activity "... if the employees have a reasonable basis for believing that their understanding of the terms was the understanding that had been agreed upon...." (emphasis supplied)