§

Schmitz Food, Inc.

313 N.L.R.B. 554 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Schmitz Food, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Campbell-Harris Elec., Inc.

    719 F.2d 292 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 16 times
    Affirming the National Labor Relations Board ("N.L.R.B.") finding that ownership and management of first company, a two-man partnership, was substantially identical to that of second company, a sole proprietorship

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. M.P. Bldg. Corp.

    411 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 4 times

    No. 26473. May 14, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, Houston, Tex., Ronald R. Helveston, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Burton L. Raimi, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Hugh G. Freeland, Lavon L. Jones, Beaumont, Tex., for respondents. Before BELL and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court

  6. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    216 F.2d 273 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 12 times

    No. 14018. October 13, 1954. Roth Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., St. Sure Moore, Oakland, Cal., for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Alan R. Waterstone, Attys. NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BONE, ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found that the Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, hereafter the Company