Scapino Steel Erectors, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
  4. Industrial Turnaround v. N.L.R.B

    115 F.3d 248 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that one panel may not overrule another
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Somerville Const

    206 F.3d 752 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 5 times

    No. 99-1838 Argued January 19, 2000 Decided March 8, 2000 Petition for Summary Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board 25-CA-25276 John D. Burgoyne (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Roberto G. Chavarry, Region 25, Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner. Kim K. Ebert, James D. Masur, II (argued), Locke Reynolds, Indianapolis, IN, for respondent. Before BAUER, CUDAHY, and EVANS, Circuit Judges. BAUER, Circuit Judge. An