§
SBC California

6 Cited authorities

  1. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  2. N.L.R.B. v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc.

    39 F.3d 1410 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant

  3. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  4. Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. N. L. R. B

    165 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Power Co.

    531 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times

    No. 75-1661. April 22, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Bert Bisgyer, Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, Chief District Judge. The Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, Chief District Judge, for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ORDER The National Labor

  6. Section 102.118 - Present and former Board employees prohibited from producing documents and testifying; production of witnesses' statements after direct testimony

    29 C.F.R. § 102.118   Cited 57 times

    (a)Prohibition on producing files and documents. Except as provided in § 102.117 respecting requests cognizable under the Freedom of Information Act, no present or former employee or specially designated agent of the Agency will produce or present any files, documents, reports, memoranda, or records of the Board or of the General Counsel, whether in response to a subpoena duces tecum or otherwise, without the written consent of the Board or the Chairman of the Board if the document is in Washington