Sapulpa Typographical Union No. 619, A/W ITU

12 Cited authorities

  1. Thornhill v. Alabama

    310 U.S. 88 (1940)   Cited 1,704 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights
  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.

    354 U.S. 284 (1957)   Cited 163 times
    In Teamsters Union, supra, a railroad was held to be barred from seeking relief in the state courts against a secondary boycott.
  4. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl

    315 U.S. 769 (1942)   Cited 236 times
    Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing
  5. Carpenters Union v. Ritter's Cafe

    315 U.S. 722 (1942)   Cited 174 times
    Upholding state law outlawing secondary picketing
  6. Pappas v. Stacey and Winslow

    151 Me. 36 (Me. 1955)   Cited 32 times
    In Pappas v. Stacey, 151 Me. 36, 116 A.2d 497 (1955), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 350 U.S. 870, 100 L. ed. 770 (1955), the object was to compel a violation of Maine's policy against an employer's interference with the free choice of the employees in the matter of organization.
  7. Greene v. International Typographical Union

    182 F. Supp. 788 (D. Conn. 1960)   Cited 8 times
    In Greene v. International Typographical Union, D.C.Conn., 182 F. Supp. 788, the constitutionality of § 8(b)(7)(C) is specifically upheld against an attack similar to that here made.
  8. McLeod v. Local 239, Internat'l Bro. of Teamsters

    179 F. Supp. 481 (E.D.N.Y. 1960)   Cited 7 times

    Civ. No. 20331. January 7, 1960. Ivan C. McLeod, Regional Director of the Second Region, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Jacques Schurre, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Katz Wolchok, New York City, for respondent. Charles R. Katz, New York City, of counsel. Bruno Baratta, Mineola, N.Y., for Charging Party, Stan-Jay Auto Parts and Accessories Corp. BARTELS, District Judge. This proceeding comes before the Court upon the petition filed by the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant

  9. Cuneo v. United Shoe Workers of America, Etc.

    181 F. Supp. 324 (D.N.J. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    Civ. No. 100-60. February 26, 1960. Jacques Schurre, of National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rothbard, Harris Oxfeld, Newark, N.J., Cooper, Ostrin DeVarco, Eugene N. Sosnoff, New York City, for respondents. MEANEY, District Judge. This proceeding is before the court on a petition filed on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board (Board herein), pursuant to Section 10 (l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended ( 61 Stat. 149, 73 Stat. 544, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160

  10. Lord v. Sanchez

    136 Cal.App.2d 704 (Cal. Ct. App. 1955)   Cited 9 times

    Docket No. 16443. November 2, 1955. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Leonard R. Avilla, Judge. Affirmed. Donald J. Kennedy for Appellants. Crist, Peters Donegan for Respondents. WOOD (Fred B.), J. Defendants Anthony and Dolores Sanchez own a parcel of land which fronts upon a highway. Plaintiffs acquired by grant an easement 20 feet wide across the Sanchez parcel as a means of access to their adjoining and nearby lands but they use a roadway which embraces only