Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital

23 Cited authorities

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 27,088 times 238 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
526 U.S. 137 (1999) Cited 12,978 times 31 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 1,301 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that expert testimony was inadmissible based on its unreliable methodology notwithstanding "the impressive qualifications of plaintiffs' experts"
City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.
158 F.3d 548 (11th Cir. 1998) Cited 762 times
Holding that courts should avoid "the confusion and conflation of admissibility issues with issues regarding the sufficiency of [a party's] evidence"
McCorvey v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
298 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2002) Cited 460 times
Holding that "[r]ulings on admissibility under Daubert inherently require the trial court to conduct an exacting analysis of the proffered expert's methodology"
Claar v. Burlington Northern R. Co.
29 F.3d 499 (9th Cir. 1994) Cited 456 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, in order to avoid summary judgment, the plaintiffs in a FELA action were required to produce expert testimony that exposure to chemicals played a part in causing their injuries
Clausen v. M/V New Carissa
339 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 298 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a right to damages is substantive and governed by state law in a diversity action because the remedy "is inseparably connected with the right of action"
Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.
356 F.3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Cited 172 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding a party's lack of explanation for why an opinion based on data acquired before the expert report was due but disclosed later in the case to be cause for excluding the expert's new analysis
Solitron Devices v. Island Territory of Curacao
416 U.S. 986 (1974) Cited 130 times
Granting enforcement
Nebraska Plastics v. Holland Colors Americas
408 F.3d 410 (8th Cir. 2005) Cited 105 times
Finding expert's opinion did not take into account facts tending to show the quantity of defective product subject to warranty claims was limited
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 27,625 times 281 Legal Analyses
Adopting the Daubert standard

Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"

Holding that expert testimony was inadmissible based on its unreliable methodology notwithstanding "the impressive qualifications of plaintiffs' experts"

Holding that courts should avoid "the confusion and conflation of admissibility issues with issues regarding the sufficiency of [a party's] evidence"

Holding that "[r]ulings on admissibility under Daubert inherently require the trial court to conduct an exacting analysis of the proffered expert's methodology"

Holding that, in order to avoid summary judgment, the plaintiffs in a FELA action were required to produce expert testimony that exposure to chemicals played a part in causing their injuries

Holding that a right to damages is substantive and governed by state law in a diversity action because the remedy "is inseparably connected with the right of action"

Holding a party's lack of explanation for why an opinion based on data acquired before the expert report was due but disclosed later in the case to be cause for excluding the expert's new analysis

Granting enforcement

Finding expert's opinion did not take into account facts tending to show the quantity of defective product subject to warranty claims was limited

Adopting the Daubert standard