§

Sandpiper Convalescent Center And Sandpiper Village

279 N.L.R.B. 1129 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Sandpiper Convalescent Center And Sandpiper Village

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  3. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  4. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984), we stated "[t]here may be cases where no forgery can be proved, but where the misrepresentation is so pervasive and the deception so artful that employees will be unable to separate truth from untruth and where their right to a free and fair choice will be affected."

  5. Gulf States Mfg. Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    704 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that an employer preserved an issue by ambiguously referencing the issue in a motion for reconsideration

  6. Dynamic Machine Co. v. N.L.R.B

    552 F.2d 1195 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that the Board found a worker a supervisor despite the fact that his assignment "options were limited and only a few factors needed to be taken into account in assigning work"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio New and Rebuilt Parts, Inc.

    760 F.2d 1443 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 83-5785, 84-5283 and 84-5174. Argued March 14, 1985. Decided April 30, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner in all cases. Donald A. Knowlton, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner in No. 84-5283. Don T. Carmody (argued), Carmody DiRienzo, New York City, for respondents in all cases. Robert Leonard, Cory, Leonard, Witter Cheney, Lima

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Eskimo Radiator Mfg. Co.

    688 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Eskimo Radiator Mfg., 688 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1982), we concluded that the employer had not shown it was prejudiced by the Regional Director's failure to forward certain affidavits, because even assuming the truth of the employer's allegations, there was no reason to overturn the election.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mike O'Connor Chevrolet-Buick-GMC Co.

    512 F.2d 684 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times

    No. 74-1645. Submitted February 13, 1975. Decided March 18, 1975. Charles A. Shaw, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles Kelso, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY, Circuit Judge, and WANGELIN and NANGLE, District Judges. H. KENNETH WANGELIN and JOHN F. NANGLE, District Judges, Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  10. Intern. U. of Electrical, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    648 F.2d 18 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 78-2067, 78-2262, 79-1682, 79-1892, 79-2563 and 80-1181 to 80-1183. Argued May 28, 1980. Decided November 28, 1980. As Modified on Rehearing January 22, 1981. Winn Newman, with whom Lawrence Gold, Richard B. Sobol, and Michael B. Trister, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO-CLC as petitioner in Nos. 78-2067 and 79-1682 and intervenor in Nos. 78-2262, 79-1892, 79-2563, and 80-1181. James G. Mauro, Jr., New York City, entered

  11. Section 5381 - Definitions

    5 U.S.C. § 5381   Cited 2 times

    For the purpose of this subchapter, "agency", "Senior Executive Service position", "career appointee", and "senior executive" have the meanings set forth in section 3132(a) of this title. 5 U.S.C. § 5381 Added Pub. L. 95-454, title IV, §407(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1171; amended Pub. L. 101-136, title VI, §625(b), Nov. 3, 1989, 103 Stat. 823. EDITORIAL NOTES AMENDMENTS1989- Pub. L. 101-136 inserted "'career appointee'," before "and". STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES EFFECTIVE DATESection