§

Sandie Boydston, Complainant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

01973236 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 25, 2000)
Sandie Boydston, Complainant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,811 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  2. Hewitt v. Helms

    482 U.S. 755 (1987)   Cited 841 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a plaintiff received no damages award, injunction or declaratory judgment, or formal judgment in plaintiff's favor, but the defendant unilaterally altered the policies of which he complained, the plaintiff could not be said to be a prevailing party