§

San Leandro Nissan Hyundai Kia

32-A-022510 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 5, 2007)
San Leandro Nissan Hyundai Kia

5 Cited authorities

  1. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 329 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Auto Fast Freight, Inc.

    793 F.2d 1126 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    No. 84-7829. Argued and Submitted December 3, 1985. Decided July 10, 1986. John G. Elligers, Joseph Oertl, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. William J. Brunick, Donald R. Alvarez, Brunick, Pyle Ludvigsen, San Bernardino, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge. The Honorable Spencer Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second