San Juan Lumber Co.

12 Cited authorities

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board
350 U.S. 270 (1956) Cited 403 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 times
Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Plasti-Line, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B
278 F.2d 482 (6th Cir. 1960) Cited 26 times
No. 13958. May 27, 1960. M.W. Egerton, Sr., Knoxville, Tenn. (M.W. Egerton, Sr., Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, Egerton, McAfee, Armistead Davis, Knoxville, Tenn., on brief), for petitioners. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and BOYD
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Draper Corp.
145 F.2d 199 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 48 times
No. 5239. October 6, 1944. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board which directed the Draper Corporation to cease and desist from unfair labor practices. Petition denied. Guy Farmer, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (Alvin J. Rockwell, General Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate General Counsel, Joseph B. Robison, and Dominick
N.L.R.B. v. R.C. Can Company
328 F.2d 974 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 17 times
In R.C. Can, a small group of unionized employees engaged in an unauthorized "quickie strike" to pressure their employer into expediting ongoing negotiations with the union.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knight Morley Corp.
251 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941) Cited 33 times
Nos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order
Harnischfeger Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
207 F.2d 575 (7th Cir. 1953) Cited 11 times
In Harnischfeger, while the employer and the certified union were in the process of negotiations, a group of employees walked off their jobs "to put a little heat on the [employer] and see what they were going to do."

San Juan Lumber Co.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

In R.C. Can, a small group of unionized employees engaged in an unauthorized "quickie strike" to pressure their employer into expediting ongoing negotiations with the union.

Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"

In Harnischfeger, while the employer and the certified union were in the process of negotiations, a group of employees walked off their jobs "to put a little heat on the [employer] and see what they were going to do."