San Garbriel Transit, Inc.

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997) Cited 96 times
Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech
134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998) Cited 28 times
Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election