San Diego County District Council of Carpenters

13 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Labor Board v. General Motors
373 U.S. 734 (1963) Cited 190 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
394 U.S. 423 (1969) Cited 117 times 6 Legal Analyses
Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029
409 U.S. 213 (1972) Cited 53 times
In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.
412 U.S. 67 (1973) Cited 49 times
Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
Booster Lodge No. 405, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
412 U.S. 84 (1973) Cited 35 times
Holding the court of appeals may not properly overrule a decision of the Supreme Court in order to force its reconsideration
Associated Press v. N.L.R.B
492 F.2d 662 (D.C. Cir. 1974) Cited 30 times
In Associated Press v. NLRB, 492 F.2d 662 (D.C. Cir. 1974), and Local Union No. 2188, IBEW v. NLRB, 494 F.2d 1087 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 835, 95 S.Ct. 61, 42 L.Ed.2d 61 (1974), we expressly approved an application of the Collyer prearbitration deferral rule.
N.L.R.B. v. Hershey Foods Corporation
513 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1975) Cited 21 times
No. 74-2114. April 15, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph E. Mayer, Atty., William R. Stewart, Atty. (argued), Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Duane B. Beeson, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for respondent. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, for intervenor. Before CARTER, WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board brought this action to enforce its orders against Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Helpers Union
Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 51 times
In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.
N.L.R.B. v. Brotherhood of Railway Airline
498 F.2d 1105 (5th Cir. 1974) Cited 10 times
Upholding prearbitration nondeferral by the Board under its Collyer doctrine

San Diego County District Council of Carpenters

13 Cited authorities

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line

Holding the court of appeals may not properly overrule a decision of the Supreme Court in order to force its reconsideration

In Associated Press v. NLRB, 492 F.2d 662 (D.C. Cir. 1974), and Local Union No. 2188, IBEW v. NLRB, 494 F.2d 1087 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 835, 95 S.Ct. 61, 42 L.Ed.2d 61 (1974), we expressly approved an application of the Collyer prearbitration deferral rule.

In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.

Upholding prearbitration nondeferral by the Board under its Collyer doctrine