§

San Benito Health Foundation

318 N.L.R.B. 299 (N.L.R.B. 1995)
San Benito Health Foundation

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Golden Day Schools, 644 F.2d 834, the court noted that although the child care workers' leaflet to parents included harsh language and serious charges about the care of the children, it fell "woefully short of the malicious tone" that would justify a discharge under Jefferson Standard. Appellant correctly points out that the court in Golden Day Schools determined that the leaflet played no part in the discharge of the employees.

  6. A.J. Krajewski Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 673 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 11 times

    No. 7224. Heard April 8, 1969. Decided July 17, 1969. William J. Sheehan, Providence, R.I., for petitioner. Eugene B. Granof, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David C. Nevins, Atty., Washington, D.C. were on brief, for N.L.R.B., respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. On August 24, 1966, Michael Andreoli was called to the

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Teknor-Apex Company

    468 F.2d 692 (1st Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 72-1115. Argued September 7, 1972. Decided October 13, 1972. William L. Corbett, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. Vernon C. Stoneman, Boston, Mass., with whom Seth M. Kalberg, Jr., and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE, Circuit Judge, and HAMLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Of the

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Lipman Brothers, Inc.

    355 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 6526. Heard December 6, 1965. Decided January 21, 1966. Anthony J. Obadal, Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Murray Brown, Boston, Mass., with whom William F. Joy and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondents. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Davidson Rubber Company

    305 F.2d 166 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 2 times

    No. 5948. July 13, 1962. James C. Paras, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Robert Sewell, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement