Sambo's Restaurant, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company

    262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 66 times
    In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.
  3. J.P. Stevens Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 44 times
    In J.P. Stevens Co. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d at 304, we enforced an order requiring posting and mailing of notices to employees at forty-three of Stevens' plants in North and South Carolina when flagrant unfair labor practices were found at each of the twenty plants in that region at which union campaigns were started.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Broyhill Company

    514 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 25 times
    In Broyhill, the Eighth Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that McWilliams was a supervisor.
  5. Helena Laboratories Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    557 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 20 times

    No. 76-3077. August 22, 1977. George E. Duncan, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen., Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Atty., Alan Banov, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before THORNBERRY, AINSWORTH and RONEY, Circuit Judges. AINSWORTH, Circuit

  6. Hertzka Knowles v. N.L.R.B

    503 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times
    Rejecting "purely adversarial model of labor relations"
  7. Southwest Regional Jt. Bd., v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that the "proper question `is not whether an employee actually felt intimidated but whether the employer engaged in conduct which may reasonably be said to tend to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act'" (quoting Joy Silk Mills, supra, 185 F.2d at 743-44)
  8. N.L.R.B. v. H.W. Elson Bottling Company

    379 F.2d 223 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Elson Bottling Company, 379 F.2d 223 (6th Cir. 1967), the Board found that the company engaged in a campaign of coercive speeches to its employees, threatening layoffs and curtailment of operations, as well as promising wage increases.