§

Salmon Terminal Division

233 N.L.R.B. 1178 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Salmon Terminal Division

12 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters v. United States

    431 U.S. 324 (1977)   Cited 4,648 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff who did not apply for a position can still make prima facie showing if he can demonstrate his application for the position would have been futile

  2. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  3. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans

    431 U.S. 553 (1977)   Cited 1,339 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an allegedly discriminatory practice that was no longer actionable could not form the predicate of a challenge to a neutral seniority system

  4. Frontiero v. Richardson

    411 U.S. 677 (1973)   Cited 1,081 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional exclusion of married female officers in the military from benefits automatically accorded married male officers

  5. Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld

    420 U.S. 636 (1975)   Cited 736 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a Social Security classification that excluded fathers from receipt of child-in-care benefits available to mothers

  6. Humphrey v. Moore

    375 U.S. 335 (1964)   Cited 760 times
    Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

  7. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  8. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  9. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  10. Local Un. No. 12, v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 12 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 90 times

    No. 22239. November 9, 1966. Clarence Rhea, Gadsden, Ala., Robert L. Carter, New York City, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and GARZA, District Judge. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 12 (hereinafter referred to as Local 12), initiated these proceedings to review