§

Salem Electric Co.

331 N.L.R.B. 1575 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Salem Electric Co.

15 Cited authorities

  1. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 339 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  3. Langevine v. District of Columbia

    106 F.3d 1018 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 123 times
    Holding trial judge did not abuse discretion by reinstating jury's award of damages on false arrest and false imprisonment claims, including $200,000 for bodily injury, physical pain and suffering, and mental anguish

  4. Genentech, Inc. v. U.S. Intl. Trade Comm

    122 F.3d 1409 (Fed. Cir. 1997)   Cited 99 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Genentech did not provide compelling arguments to limit waiver where privileged documents had been produced as a result of inadequate screening procedures

  5. U.S. v. Palmer

    122 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 1997)   Cited 72 times
    Explaining that an appellate court has jurisdiction to review a trial court's refusal to grant a downward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines only if the district court's refusal to depart downward is premised upon the court's mistaken conclusion that the Guidelines do not permit such a departure

  6. Conrad v. Davis

    120 F.3d 92 (8th Cir. 1997)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that discovery of $6,000 cash in a suspect's pocket and $4,000 in his suitcase furnished reasonable suspicion

  7. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  8. America's Best Quality Coatings Corp. v. NLRB

    44 F.3d 516 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 93-4039, 94-1173, and 94-1198. Argued October 4, 1994. Decided January 4, 1995. James R. Scott, Alan M. Levy (argued), Lindner Marsack, Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner. John C. Truesdale, Robert J. Englehart, Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, Deborah E. Shrager (argued), Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Joseph A. Szabo, Director, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, WI, for N.L.R.B. Mary E. Leary (argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Terry Davis, Elizabeth Levie, United

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.

    47 F.3d 1536 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 92-70645, 92-70658. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1994. Decided February 22, 1995. Wayne D. Landsverk, Newcomb, Sabin, Schwartz and Landsverk, Portland, OR, for respondent-cross-petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, Peter Winkler and Fred L. Cornnell, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for petitioner-cross-respondent. On Application for Enforcement and Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: ALARCON, NORRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge NORRIS; Partial Concurrence

  10. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 94,314 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,059 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

  12. Rule 612 - Writing Used to Refresh a Witness's Memory

    Fed. R. Evid. 612   Cited 517 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Providing rules for using a writing to refresh a witness's recollection

  13. Section 102.118 - Present and former Board employees prohibited from producing documents and testifying; production of witnesses' statements after direct testimony

    29 C.F.R. § 102.118   Cited 57 times

    (a)Prohibition on producing files and documents. Except as provided in § 102.117 respecting requests cognizable under the Freedom of Information Act, no present or former employee or specially designated agent of the Agency will produce or present any files, documents, reports, memoranda, or records of the Board or of the General Counsel, whether in response to a subpoena duces tecum or otherwise, without the written consent of the Board or the Chairman of the Board if the document is in Washington

  14. Section 101.4 - Investigation of charges

    29 C.F.R. § 101.4   Cited 17 times

    When the charge is received in the Regional Office it is filed, docketed, and assigned a case number. The Regional Director may cause a copy of the charge to be served on the person against whom the charge is made, but timely service of a copy of the charge within the meaning of the proviso to section 10(b) of the Act is the exclusive responsibility of the charging party and not of the Regional Director. The Regional Director requests the person filing the charge to submit promptly evidence in its

  15. Section 102.14 - Service of charge

    29 C.F.R. § 102.14   Cited 3 times

    (a)Charging Party's obligation to serve; methods of service. Upon the filing of a charge, the Charging Party is responsible for the timely and proper service of a copy upon the person against whom such charge is made. Service may be made personally, or by registered mail, certified mail, regular mail, private delivery service, or facsimile. With the permission of the person receiving the charge, service may be made by email or by any other agreed-upon method. (b)Service as courtesy by Regional Director