§

Saint Luke's Hospital

258 N.L.R.B. 321 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Saint Luke's Hospital

10 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,726 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  4. Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    565 F.2d 1074 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 125 times
    Recognizing that "[t]he substantial evidence standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Maxwell

    637 F.2d 698 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times
    In Maxwell, however, we specifically pointed out that the employer did not argue that the employee's attempts to enforce the provisions of the contract were not a protected activity.

  6. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    530 F.2d 137 (10th Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times
    In Groendyke the record showed that the rule was actively enforced in an unlawful manner to prevent any distribution or solicitation "on Company premises at any time."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. J. P. Stevens Co.

    464 F.2d 1326 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 8 times
    Holding Stevens in civil contempt for failure to comply with Court of Appeals order affirming NLRB enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act

  8. Salinas Valley Broadcasting Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    334 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times

    No. 18852. July 8, 1964. Jacob Abramson, Salinas, Cal., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Glen M. Bendixsen, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BARNES, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. Salinas Valley Broadcasting Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Salinas" or petitioner) brought this proceeding to review and modify a decision

  9. S.H. Kress Company v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.2d 225 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 18339. April 23, 1963. George O. Bahrs and Robert J. Scolnik, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Stephen B. Goldberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, ORR and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court on the petition of S.H. Kress Co., to review and set aside an order of the National Labor

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armour Co.

    213 F.2d 625 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14821. June 25, 1954. John C. Carey, Counsel, Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Louis Schwartz, Edmond F. Rovner, for National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harold L. Langdon, Chicago, Ill., Leon Sarpy, New Orleans, La., Chaffe, McCall, Toler Phillips, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge. DAWKINS, District Judge. This