§

Saia Motor Freight Line

333 N.L.R.B. 784 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Saia Motor Freight Line

9 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

    516 U.S. 85 (1995)   Cited 85 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. McCullough Environmental Serv

    5 F.3d 923 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 98 times
    Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat

  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Haven Nursing Home, Inc.

    542 F.2d 691 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "anticipatory photographing. . . . does not violate § 8 of the Act where the photographs are taken to establish for purposes of an injunction suit that pickets engaged in violence"

  7. Flambeau Plastics Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times

    No. 16560. August 2, 1968. Certiorari Denied January 13, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 625. Walter S. Davis, Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Kenneth R. Loebel, Richard M. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., Goldberg, Previant Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy S. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Berton Kirshner

    523 F.2d 1046 (9th Cir. 1975)

    No. 74-2022. September 23, 1975. Charles P. Donnelly, Atty., N.L.R.B. (argued), Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Stuart P. Herman (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for respondent. Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge. Honorable Charles L. Powell, Senior United States District Judge, Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation. Judge Powell concurred in the opinion as written but died before it could be filed. OPINION PER CURIAM: This is an application of

  9. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,213 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”