§

Sahara-Tahoe Hotel

229 N.L.R.B. 1094 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Sahara-Tahoe Hotel

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    423 F.2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 42 times
    In Frick itself, we upheld the Board policy of applying an irrebuttable presumption of continued majority status for a "reasonable period of time" to voluntarily recognized unions, and applying a rebuttable presumption thereafter. 423 F.2d at 1332.

  4. Automated Business Systems v. N.L.R.B

    497 F.2d 262 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 29 times
    Holding a bargaining order is appropriate where at one point the union had a majority but employer misconduct undermined majority strength and impeded the election process

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Tragniew, Inc.

    470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.

  6. Orion Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    515 F.2d 81 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 22 times

    No. 74-1432. Argued January 15, 1975. Decided April 28, 1975. Walter S. Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne and Roger T. Brice, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Associate Justice. and CUMMINGS and TONE, Circuit Judges. Associate Justice Tom C. Clark of the Supreme Court of the United States (Retired) is sitting by designation. PER CURIAM

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Downtown Bakery Corp.

    330 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Downtown Bakery, the court upheld the policy of the NLRB that the employer, faced with competing demands for recognition, violated sections 8(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act by executing and maintaining a collective bargaining agreement with a rival union.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. King Radio Corporation

    510 F.2d 1154 (10th Cir. 1975)   Cited 13 times

    No. 74-1421. Argued January 24, 1975. Decided February 12, 1975. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1975. Alan D. Longman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and William H. DuRoss, III, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief) for petitioner. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (Eidson, Lewis, Porter Haynes, Topeka, Kan., on the brief) for respondent. Blake, Uhlig Funk, Kansas City, Kan

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Richard W. Kaase Company

    346 F.2d 24 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times
    In NLRB v. Richard W. Kaase Co., 346 F.2d 24 (6th Cir. 1965), the Sixth Circuit did hold that withdrawal from a multi-employer unit vitiated the presumption despite the existence of a separate contract between the union and Kaase. But in that case the union's position as exclusive bargaining representative of the Kaase employees originated with an election in the multi-employer unit.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.

    359 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.