Sahara Las Vegas Corp.

18 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  3. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  5. Brown v. Hotel Employees

    468 U.S. 491 (1984)   Cited 193 times
    Holding that when “state law regulates conduct that is actually protected by federal law ... the federal law must prevail”
  6. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  7. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Anchorage Times Pub. Co.

    637 F.2d 1359 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 29 times

    No. 79-7024. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1980. Decided February 27, 1981. Rehearing Denied April 29, 1981. Ruah Donnelly Lahey. Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas A. Riggs, Anchorage, Alaska, argued, for respondent; Karl Johnstown, Anchorage, Alaska, on brief. On Petition to Review and Cross-application to Enforce a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson River Aggregates

    639 F.2d 865 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that the NLRB's bargaining unit determinations are rarely to be disturbed unless arbitrary, unreasonable, or not supported by substantial evidence.
  10. Hotel Res. Emp. Bar. Int. Un. v. Danziger

    709 F.2d 815 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 82-5210, 82-5234 and 82-5260. Argued November 15, 1982. Decided June 6, 1983. Bernard N. Katz (argued), Michael N. Katz, Meranze, Katz, Spear Wilderman, Philadelphia, Pa., for Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartender Intern. Union Local 54, et al. Irwin I. Kimmelman, Atty. Gen., State of N.J., Anthony J. Parrillo, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Gary A. Ehrlich, Deputy Atty. Gen., Dept. of Law Public Safety, Div. of Gaming Enforcement, Trenton, N.J., for New Jersey Dept. of Law and Public Safety

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions