Saddle West Restaurant

13 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., Inc. of Delaware

    651 F.2d 442 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 651 F.2d 442 (6th Cir. 1981), the court recited the Wright Line test but did not analyze it.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Bighorn Beverage

    614 F.2d 1238 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    Describing relationship between sections; § 7 establishes rights and § 8 enforces them
  6. Signal Oil and Gas Company v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that a non-union employee engaged in protected concerted activity
  7. Ontario Knife Co. v. N.L.R.B

    637 F.2d 840 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 10 times
    Interpreting Weingarten
  8. N.L.R.B. v. C I Air Conditioning, Inc.

    486 F.2d 977 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. C I Air Conditioning, Inc., supra, 486 F.2d 977, 978, the court recognized the "emergence of [the Interboro] rule" but found it unnecessary to follow.
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Prescott Industrial Products Company

    500 F.2d 6 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 8 times
    Permitting firing where walkout undermined employer's authority
  10. Marshall Field Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    200 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 30 times
    Approving employer's banning of solicitors from selling areas when they acted in "loud and rowdy" manner