§

S. L. Industries, Inc., 1-CA-14224

252 N.L.R.B. 1058 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
S. L. Industries, Inc., 1-CA-14224

12 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,302 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  4. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  5. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  6. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  8. Abilities and Goodwill, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors to be considered when determining whether concerted action is protected

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Okla-Inn

    488 F.2d 498 (10th Cir. 1973)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1737. Argued and Submitted May 22, 1973. Decided October 26, 1973. Rehearing Denied January 23, 1974. Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, Russell H. Gardner, William F. Wachter, Marjorie S. Godfreed, Peter G. Nash, John S. Irving, and Patrick Hardin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C. A. Kothe and Richard L. Barnes, Koths Eagleton, Inc., Tulsa, Okl., for respondent. John M. Keefer, Jarboe Keefer, Tulsa, Okl., for intervenor. Before SETH and DOYLE, Circuit Judges, and LARAMORE, Senior

  10. N.L.R.B. v. L. D. McFarland Co.

    572 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times

    No. 75-3364. March 27, 1978. Rehearing Denied May 4, 1978. William Stewart (argued), Portland, Or., for petitioner. George J. Tichy (argued), Spokane, Wash., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before ELY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge. Honorable Peirson M. Hall, Senior District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation. ELY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (Board), pursuant to