S-H Food Service. Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,893 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
  2. John Wiley Sons v. Livingston

    376 U.S. 543 (1964)   Cited 1,771 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
  3. U.S. Gypsum Co. v. United Steelworkers of Amer

    384 F.2d 38 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 30 times
    Rejecting broad claim that "[u]nion, subsequent to its decertification, ha[d] no right to enforce the [relevant collective bargaining] agreement or any of its provisions" and permitting decertified union to assert grievances for relief that "arose under the contract and for breach of which effective relief was available prior to decertification"
  4. United Steelworkers of Amer. v. Reliance Univ

    335 F.2d 891 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 34 times
    In Reliance Universal and Wackenhut, supra, one entity purchased the business of another and continued the previous operation without significant change, employing substantially all of the seller's organized personnel.
  5. International Chemical Wkrs. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    395 F.2d 639 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 21331, 21484. Argued April 17, 1968. Decided May 1, 1968. Petition for Rehearing Denied June 27, 1968. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Stephen E. Moss, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 21,331 and intervenors in No. 21,484. Mr. Larry Lesh, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Warren Woods and Mrs. Betty Southard Murphy, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant in No