4 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Zall v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
202 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 8 timesNo. 13031. March 17, 1953. Rich, Carlin Fuidge, Marysville, Cal., for petitioners. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Louis Schwartz and Fannie Boyls Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. American Federation of Grain Millers International Union, hereinafter referred
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Valley Broadcast
189 F.2d 582 (6th Cir. 1951) Cited 8 timesNo. 11212. June 1, 1951. Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Louis Schwartz, and Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Carl A. Weinman, Steubenville, Ohio, for respondent. Carl A. Weinman, Berkman, Weinman Anglin, Steubenville, Ohio, Allen H. Berkman, Robert Engel, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. HICKS, Chief Judge. Petition of the National Labor Relations