S. California Gas Company

9 Cited authorities

Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 228 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Building Trades Employers' Ass'n v. McGowan
311 F.3d 501 (2d Cir. 2002) Cited 107 times
Holding that the NLRB has "primary jurisdiction to decide what conduct is protected or prohibited in labormanagement relations under the NLRA."
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983) Cited 41 times
Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner
N.L.R.B. v. Illinois-American Water Co.
933 F.2d 1368 (7th Cir. 1991) Cited 19 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that accretion is "the addition of a relatively small group of employees to an existing bargaining unit where these additional employees have a sufficient community of interest with the unit employees and have no separate identity."
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 times
Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Power Co.
531 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1976) Cited 7 times
No. 75-1661. April 22, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Bert Bisgyer, Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, Chief District Judge. The Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, Chief District Judge, for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ORDER The National Labor
J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.
Section 12101 - Findings and purpose
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Cited 24,175 times 67 Legal Analyses
Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"

S. California Gas Company

9 Cited authorities

Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that the NLRB has "primary jurisdiction to decide what conduct is protected or prohibited in labormanagement relations under the NLRA."

Explaining that accretion is "the addition of a relatively small group of employees to an existing bargaining unit where these additional employees have a sufficient community of interest with the unit employees and have no separate identity."

Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"