§

Rykoff- Sexton, Inc.

No. 75045478 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 29, 1998)
Rykoff- Sexton, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Canadian Imperial Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank

    811 F.2d 1490 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming likelihood of confusion

  2. In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.

    837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"

  3. Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed

  4. Mr. Hero Sandwich Systems, Inc. v. Roman Meal Co.

    781 F.2d 884 (Fed. Cir. 1986)   Cited 3 times

    Appeal No. 85-2031. January 10, 1986. Linn J. Raney of Watts, Hoffmann, Fisher Heinke, Co., L.P.A., Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellant. Edward M. Prince of Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before BALDWIN, KASHIWA, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. BALDWIN, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board)

  5. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,584 times   270 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  6. Section 2.142 - Time and manner of ex parte appeals

    37 C.F.R. § 2.142   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) An appeal filed under the provisions of § 2.141(a) from the final refusal of an application must be filed within the time provided in § 2.62(a) . (2) An appeal filed under the provisions of § 2.141(b) from an expungement or reexamination proceeding must be filed within three months from the issue date of the final Office action. (3) An appeal is taken by filing a notice of appeal, as prescribed in § 2.126 , and paying the appeal fee. (b) (1) The brief of appellant shall be filed within sixty