§

Ryder Student Transportation, Inc.

297 N.L.R.B. 371 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Ryder Student Transportation, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Leedom v. Kyne

    358 U.S. 184 (1958)   Cited 727 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers

  2. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.

    376 U.S. 473 (1964)   Cited 426 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers

  3. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional

    372 U.S. 10 (1963)   Cited 284 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"

  4. Palmquist v. Mercer

    43 Cal.2d 92 (Cal. 1954)   Cited 79 times

    Docket No. L.A. 22604. June 25, 1954. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Joseph M. Maltby, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Fred N. Howser, Russell H. Pray and Eric A. Rose for Appellant. Parker, Stanbury, Reese McGee and Richard E. Reese for Respondent Mercer. Ball, Hunt Hart, and Clarence S. Hunt for Respondent Union Oil Company. Moss, Lyon Dunn, Sidney A. Moss and Henry F. Walker for Respondent Tide Water Associated Oil Company. SPENCE, J. Plaintiff

  5. Jefferson County Community Center v. N.L.R.B

    732 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that an entity was not exempt as a political subdivision under section 152"although seven directors are appointed by public agencies" because "a majority of the Board is neither appointed by nor subject to removal by public officials or the general electorate and has no official connection to any governmental body"

  6. R. W. Harmon Sons, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    664 F.2d 248 (10th Cir. 1981)   Cited 7 times
    Holding Board properly exercised jurisdiction when employer controlled "the basic bargaining subjects: wages, seniority, grievance procedures, vacation, insurance, and retirement plans"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit

  9. Goldner v. Jaffe

    171 Cal.App.2d 751 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)   Cited 4 times

    Docket No. 23701. July 7, 1959. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Edward R. Brand, Judge. Affirmed. Melvin J. Klarin for Appellant. Levy, Bernard Jaffe and F. Filmore Jaffe for Respondent. LILLIE, J. Plaintiff, as payee of a promissory note for $5,000 executed by defendant, brought this action for payment. Trial was before the court sitting without a jury. From a judgment in defendant's favor on the ground that there was no consideration for the instrument plaintiff

  10. Nichols v. Hitchcock Motor Co.

    22 Cal.App.2d 151 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. 11286. July 22, 1937. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. Edward Henderson, Judge Presiding. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Kelso, Berryman, Grua Counts for Appellant. Griffith Thornburgh for Respondents. HOUSER, P.J. From the record herein, it appears that the defendant was engaged in the business of selling, servicing and repairing Packard automobiles; that plaintiff was the owner of a Dodge automobile; that an agreement