Holding that a co-defendant's failure to timely consent to removal "was subsequently cured when [the co-defendant] opposed [the plaintiff's] remand motion, thereby clearly communicating its desire to be in federal court."
Holding that a hybrid witness whose opinion testimony arose "not from his enlistment as an expert but, rather, from his ground-level involvement in the events giving rise to the litigation" fell "outside the compass of Rule 26(B)"
Ruling that, even where medical matters are concerned, a defendant does not need an expert witness to dispute the plaintiff's position on factual issues
In Sprague v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 177 F.R.D. 78 (D.N.H. 1998), the court held that "[w]hile all experts must be disclosed under Rule 26(a)(2)(A), only `retained' experts must provide Rule 26(a)(2)(B) reports."
4:11-cv-243 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 17, 2013) Cited 10 times
Finding that inadmissible portions of summary judgment affidavit were so interwoven with the rest of the affidavit that the affidavit should be excluded in its entirety
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 Cited 16,777 times 105 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,585 times 272 Legal Analyses
Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"