§

Rozelle Shoe Corp.

100 N.L.R.B. 117 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Rozelle Shoe Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    180 F.2d 840 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co., 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 840, 844, similar contentions were considered and determined.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wiltse

    188 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 27 times

    No. 11128. Decided March 23, 1951. As Amended on Rehearing June 1, 1951. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, and Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Meader, Washington, D.C. (George Meader, Washington, D.C., John S. Dobson, Ann Arbor, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed its petition

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Red Rock Co.

    187 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13375. February 15, 1951. Rehearing Denied March 9, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. M.E. Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Georgia, for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. In its general aspects this is an ordinary proceeding by the Board for the enforcement of one of its remedial

  5. Law v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    192 F.2d 236 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times

    No. 4224. October 25, 1951. R.C. Garland, Las Cruces, N.M. (Garland Sanders, Las Cruces, N.M., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, all of Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., NLRB, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit

  6. John S. Barnes Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    190 F.2d 127 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times
    In John S. Barnes Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 190 F.2d 127, at page 130, where the company had no anti-union background or pattern of conduct hostile to unionism, this court said: "However, the courts have not considered isolated remarks or questions, which did not in themselves contain threats or promises, and where there was no pattern or background of union hostility, as coercion of the employees and as a violation of § 8(a)(1)."

  7. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Abbott Worsted Mills

    127 F.2d 438 (1st Cir. 1942)   Cited 14 times

    No. 3752. April 23, 1942. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered by the board against Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc. Decree enforcing order. William S. Gordon, Jr., of Boston, Mass. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, and Thomas E. Shroyer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John P. Carleton, of Manchester, N.H. (McLane, Davis Carleton, of Manchester

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. I.F. Sales Co.

    188 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11216. March 23, 1951. George J. Bott, Washington, D.C., John A. Hull. Jr., and Philip Fusco, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. R.F. Vandemark and R.W. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, R.W. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the findings of the National Labor Relations Board that employee