Royal Plating and Polishing Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Edwards v. California
314 U.S. 160 (1941) Cited 330 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding it unconstitutional for a state to prohibit bringing an "indigent," nonresident into the state
Telegraphers v. Chicago N.W. R. Co.
362 U.S. 330 (1960) Cited 140 times
Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia
N.L.R.B. v. Rapid Bindery, Inc.
293 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 48 times
In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.
Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 22 times
In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.
East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B
322 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 19 times
Nos. 17275, 17468. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided July 3, 1963. Petitions for Rehearing Before the Division Denied September 27, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1963. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17275 and intervenors in No. 17468. Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., was

Royal Plating and Polishing Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Holding it unconstitutional for a state to prohibit bringing an "indigent," nonresident into the state

Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia

In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.

In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.