§
Rouse Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 481 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 874 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Tragniew, Inc.

    470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Interstate 65 Corporation

    453 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times

    No. 71-1198. December 30, 1971. Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jack H. Weiner, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Morris B. Borowitz, Louisville, Ky., Borowitz, Slyn Russell, Louisville, Ky., for respondent. Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges. JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found respondent

  6. United Steelworkers of America v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 18921, 20211. Argued November 22, 1966. Decided March 24, 1967. Petitions for Rehearing Denied April 21, 1967. Mr. Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Elliott Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 18,921 and intervenor in No. 20,211. Mrs. Janet Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the

  7. Piasecki Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 31 times

    Nos. 12912, 12995. Argued February 1, 1960. Decided June 20, 1960. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing in No. 12912, August 26, 1960. Francis E. Marshall, Philadelphia, Pa. (James J. Davis, Davis, Marshall Crumlish, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner Piasecki Aircraft Corp. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C. (Ernest S. Wilson, Jr., Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for petitioners UAW-AFL-CIO and its Local 840. Allison W. Brown Jr., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas

  8. K.B. J. Young's Super Markets v. N.L.R.B

    377 F.2d 463 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times

    No. 20827. April 28, 1967. Ted Frame, Frame Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for appellant. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Marsha E. Swiss, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Charles M. Arak, Los Angeles, Cal., for intervenor, Butchers Union Local 193, AFL-CIO. Before HAMLIN, JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

  9. Tri State Maintenance Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.2d 171 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 10 times

    No. 21655. Argued September 10, 1968. Decided December 18, 1968. Mr. Ross O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. George A. Fisher, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Robert Lieber, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for respondent. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel,

  10. N.L.R.B. v. New England Tank Industries, Inc.

    302 F.2d 273 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    In New England Tank, which was essentially a discriminatory refusal to hire 49 of a predecessor's work force, the company had already offered three predecessor employees employment and the offer of employment had been accepted.