Roundy's Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  2. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  3. Lunney, an Infant v. Prodigy Services Co.

    529 U.S. 1098 (2000)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-1430. May 1, 2000, OCTOBER TERM, 1999. Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 N. Y. 2d 242, 723 N. E. 2d 539.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Calkins

    187 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 53 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest
  5. Jacobs v. Major

    139 Wis. 2d 492 (Wis. 1987)   Cited 62 times
    Finding no state action and noting that "[i]t is clear that malls . . . [cannot] be said to have an essentially public function. Malls, shopping centers, department stores, and specialty stores exist for primarily one function: profit for their owners. The public nature of their business is a byproduct. . . ."
  6. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Elec

    2001 WI App. 276 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 22 times
    In Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Elec.Coop., 2001 WI App 276, ¶ 8, 249 Wis. 2d 115, 637 N.W.2d 80, the circuit court disposed of one of the plaintiffs' claims, and the parties stipulated to dismissal of the plaintiffs' other claims with a proviso that the latter claims could be revived if the court of appeals reversed the circuit court's dismissal.
  7. Hunter v. McDonald

    78 Wis. 2d 338 (Wis. 1977)   Cited 55 times
    In Hunter v. McDonald, 78 Wis.2d 338, 344, 254 N.W.2d 282 (1977), this court adopted a definition of nuisance from 66 C.J.S. Nuisances sec. 1 (1950): "A nuisance is a wrong which may arise from the unreasonable or unlawful use by a person of his own property."
  8. State v. Horn

    139 Wis. 2d 473 (Wis. 1987)   Cited 28 times

    No. 85-0246-CR. Argued March 4, 1987. — Decided June 23, 1987. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Jonathan M. Menn, Menn, Nelson, Sharratt, Teetaert Beisenstein, Ltd., Appleton, Steven F. McDowell, general counsel, Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Steven F. McDowell. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with

  9. O'Neil's Markets v. United Food

    95 F.3d 733 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer cannot exclude handbillers unless they interfere with the right of employer, employees and customers to use the easement property
  10. Weis Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    265 F.3d 239 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 98-1892, 98-2017. Argued January 27, 1999. Decided September 11, 2001. ARGUED: Robert Lewis, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler Krupman, Woodbury, NY, for Weis Markets. Robert Paul Joy, Morgan, Brown Joy, Boston, MA, for Amicus Curiae. Julie Brock Broido, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Board. Carey Robert Butsavage, Butsavage Associates, P.C., Washington, DC, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: Roger S. Kaplan, Steven I. Farbman, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler Krupman, Woodbury

  11. Section 3 CCR 714-1-P-1

    3 Colo. Code Regs. § 714-1-P-1   Cited 448 times
    Providing that defendant “will repair any leaks resulting from defects in the materials or workmanship”