§

Rotary Business Systems, Inc.,

282 N.L.R.B. 378 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Rotary Business Systems, Inc.,

8 Cited authorities

  1. J. M. Tanaka Const., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    675 F.2d 1029 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that common ownership is but one factor to be considered by the Board and it "is not a necessary prerequisite to an alter ego finding."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Blake Const. Co., Inc.

    663 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that petitioner's exception "to the ALJ's conclusions of law as `based on misstatements of facts, mistaken premises, suppositions, hearsay, and misapplication of law'" sufficiently preserved a due process issue

  3. Prudential Insurance Company of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 77 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    Recognizing that bargaining obligation "extends to . . . the administration of [CBAs] already adopted"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Campbell-Harris Elec., Inc.

    719 F.2d 292 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 16 times
    Affirming the National Labor Relations Board ("N.L.R.B.") finding that ownership and management of first company, a two-man partnership, was substantially identical to that of second company, a sole proprietorship

  5. NLRB v. Item Co.

    220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 36 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Item Company, 220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955), this court held that an employer had no confidentiality privilege to withhold from the union relevant wage data, "which the union's own employee-members apparently refused to disclose to it."

  6. Standard Oil Co. of Calif., W.O. v. N.L.R.B

    399 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times
    In Standard Oil, the court upheld the Board's conclusion that the furnishing of employee addresses was relevant and necessary to the union's performance of its responsibilities in collective bargaining and contract administration, and it required that the employer furnish the requested list of addresses.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Johnson Electric Company, Inc.

    472 F.2d 161 (6th Cir. 1973)

    No. 72-2004. January 3, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William T. Little, Director, Region 25, N.L.R.B., Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner. Wells T. Lovett, Charles L. Lamar, Jr., Owensboro, Ky., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and LIVELY, Circuit Judges. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board on October 10, 1972, filed an application for enforcement of its order and decision in its case No. 25-CA-4173. On November 16, 1972

  8. Aluminum Ore Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    131 F.2d 485 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 26 times

    No. 7995. November 30, 1942. Petition to Review and Set Aside and on Request for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by Aluminum Ore Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which asked that the order be enforced. Petition to vacate denied, order modified, and as modified enforced. Bruce A. Campbell, of East St. Louis, Ill., and Frank B. Ingersoll, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Kramer, Campbell, Costello Wiechert, of East St. Louis,