§
Rossmore House

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  3. TRW-United Greenfield Division v. N.L.R.B

    637 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 38 times
    Discussing what threatened employees could reasonably conclude as the litmus test for a Section 8 violation

  4. Midwest Stock Exchange, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 31 times
    In Midwest Stock Exch., Inc. v. NLRB, 635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980), the court found that an employer discriminatorily enforced its no-solicitation rule by strictly enforcing the rule against union activities but permitting "[s]uch drives as the Crusade of Mercy, collection of blood in a bloodmobile... [on the employer's] premises, the selling of Avon products, Tupperware, boat cruise tickets, raffle tickets, Girl Scout cookies, and a number of other items."

  5. Graham Arch. Products Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 534 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 25 times
    Arguing for judicial review of second-election orders in the certification context

  6. Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    723 F.2d 1468 (10th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times

    No. 81-2107. December 23, 1983. Gina Kaiser and Clifton L. Elliott of Elliott, Kaiser Freeman, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner. Jerrold Wohlgemuth, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, James D. Donathen, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys., Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Michael Radzilowsky and Lawrence A. Poltrock of DeJong

  7. Gossen Co., a Div. of U.S. Gypsum v. N.L.R.B

    719 F.2d 1354 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 9 times
    Adopting test from Plasticrafts, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 586 F.2d 185, 188 (10th Cir. 1978)

  8. Paceco v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 180 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In Paceco, as here, the employer contended that its rules may have only technically violated the Act and it had attempted to rewrite them to remove the defect.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Labor Corporation

    345 F.2d 346 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times

    No. 309, Docket 29236. Argued January 21, 1965. Decided May 3, 1965. Michael R. Brown, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Abraham I. Litwack, Uniondale, N.Y., for respondent. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. MARSHALL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations