§
Rose Hills Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Director, Off. of Work. Comp. v. Greenwich Collieries

    512 U.S. 267 (1994)   Cited 450 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the Administrative Procedure Act, the burden of proof encompasses the burden of persuasion; when the evidence is evenly balanced, the party with the burden must lose

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Southwest Merchandising Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    53 F.3d 1334 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that the jury could infer pretext and unlawful discrimination from an employer's shifting and inconsistent explanations for its action

  5. Schaeff Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    113 F.3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 13 times

    No. 96-1190 Argued February 10, 1997 Decided May 27, 1997 Gerald M. Richardson, St. Louis, MO, argued the cause, for petitioner. Angela M. Washington, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause, for respondent. Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Frederick C. Havard, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on brief. David A. Seid, Attorney, Washington, DC, National Labor Relations Board, entered an appearance

  6. Columbia Portland Cement Co. v. N.L.R.B

    979 F.2d 460 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times
    Holding violations within one year had sufficient temporal proximity

  7. Georgia Kraft Co., Woodkraft Div. v. N.L.R.B

    696 F.2d 931 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times

    No. 81-7852. January 24, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 8, 1983. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer, Murphy, J. Roy Weathersby, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner, cross-respondent. James Callear, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KRAVITCH, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges. HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this case we decide that substantial evidence supports enforcement

  8. Omaha Typographical U., No. 190 v. N.L.R.B

    545 F.2d 1138 (8th Cir. 1976)   Cited 10 times

    No. 75-1833. Submitted May 12, 1976. Decided December 9, 1976. Robert E. O'Connor, Sr., and Robert E. O'Connor, Jr. (argued) and J. Patrick Green, Eisenstatt, Higgins, Kinnamon, Okun Stern, P. C., Omaha, Neb., for petitioner. John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Michael S. Winer and Andrew F. Tranovich (argued) Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for N.L.R.B. Paul S. Kuelthau

  9. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    663 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 81-7016, 81-7096. Argued and Submitted October 14, 1981. Decided December 14, 1981. Robert G. Hulteng, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner/cross-respondent. W. C. Schumann, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner. On Petition for Review and Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRILL and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge. Honorable William T. Sweigert, Senior United