§
Rose Fence, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 314 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  4. Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.

    381 U.S. 676 (1965)   Cited 243 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

  5. Local 512, Warehouse & Office Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 36 times
    In Local 512 v. NLRB ("Felbro"), 795 F.2d 705, 722 (9th Cir. 1986), the Ninth Circuit reached this holding after observing that " Sure-Tan gave no indication that it was overruling a significant line of precedent that disregards a discriminatee's legal status, as opposed to availability to work, in determining his or her eligibility for back pay."

  6. Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Advertisers Mfg. Co.

    823 F.2d 1086 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer violated Section 8 in terminating supervisory employee in retaliation for her son's rights to engage in concerted activities

  8. Geiger Ready-Mix Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    87 F.3d 1363 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board reasonably relied upon "transfer of unit work" approach in case involving double-breasted employer

  9. Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that waiver of statutory rights can be effectuated only if "intent to waive is clear and unmistakable from the evidence presented"

  10. Exxon Research Engineering Co. v. N.L.R.B

    89 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-60358. July 16, 1996. Stephen W. Smith, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, TX, for respondents. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Peter David Winkler, Julie Brock Broido, National labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Michael Dunn, Director, National Labor Relations Board, Fort Worth, TX, for NLRB. Howard Shapiro, McCalla, Thompson, Pyburn, Hymowitz Shapiro, New Orleans, LA, for The Thrift Plan of Exxon Corporation, A Part of the Benefit Plan of Exxon Corporation and participating