Roofers Local 30 (Gundle Construction)

8 Cited authorities

Little Crow Mill. v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad
476 U.S. 1158 (1986) Cited 92 times
Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"
Nelson Elec. v. N.L.R.B
638 F.2d 965 (6th Cir. 1981) Cited 44 times
Finding a nonunion successor company to be the alter ego of its union predecessor where the company name was changed but the customers, management, equipment, and employees remained the same and the cash assets of the entities were commingled
Hutter Const. v. Operating Engr., Local 139
862 F.2d 641 (7th Cir. 1988) Cited 32 times
Holding a 10(k) award to one union consistent with a contractual award to a different union
Hoeber for on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v. Local 30
939 F.2d 118 (3d Cir. 1991) Cited 23 times
Finding that an improper motive and lack of reasonable basis in law must exist before a court can issue a § 10 injunction against union prosecution of a § 301 civil suit to enforce labor arbitration award
Intern. Longshoremen's v. Pacific Maritime
773 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 30 times
Finding union's attempt to enforce an arbitration award that was inconsistent with a prior section 10(k) proceeding constituted an unfair labor practice
International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
884 F.2d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1989) Cited 21 times
Finding union cannot assert contract claims in contravention of an existing 10(k) award and thereby frustrate the purpose of section 10(k); "a union cannot force an employer to choose between a Board section 10(k) award and a squarely contrary contract claim"
International Longshoremen's v. N.L.R.B
781 F.2d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1986) Cited 12 times
Explaining that the mere fact that one group is performing the work, coupled with the fact that another group is demanding the work, is insufficient to create a jurisdictional dispute
Squillacote v. Graphic Arts Int. U. L. 277
513 F.2d 1017 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 16 times
Discussing the irreparable harm to a company in terms of the urgency of issuing an injunction

Roofers Local 30 (Gundle Construction)

8 Cited authorities

Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"

Finding a nonunion successor company to be the alter ego of its union predecessor where the company name was changed but the customers, management, equipment, and employees remained the same and the cash assets of the entities were commingled

Holding a 10(k) award to one union consistent with a contractual award to a different union

Finding that an improper motive and lack of reasonable basis in law must exist before a court can issue a § 10 injunction against union prosecution of a § 301 civil suit to enforce labor arbitration award

Finding union's attempt to enforce an arbitration award that was inconsistent with a prior section 10(k) proceeding constituted an unfair labor practice

Finding union cannot assert contract claims in contravention of an existing 10(k) award and thereby frustrate the purpose of section 10(k); "a union cannot force an employer to choose between a Board section 10(k) award and a squarely contrary contract claim"

Explaining that the mere fact that one group is performing the work, coupled with the fact that another group is demanding the work, is insufficient to create a jurisdictional dispute

Discussing the irreparable harm to a company in terms of the urgency of issuing an injunction