§

Romo Paper Products Corp.

208 N.L.R.B. 644 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Romo Paper Products Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 351 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  2. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Golub Corporation

    388 F.2d 921 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times
    Tracing case law background — including Virginia Electric — to the enactment of § 8(c) of the Taft-Hartley Act

  4. Editorial "El Imparcial," Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    278 F.2d 184 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 13 times

    No. 5568. Heard February 2, 1960. Decided May 3, 1960. George L. Weasler, Santurce, P.R., with whom Fiddler, Gonzalez, Guillemard Rodriguez, San Juan, P.R., was on the brief, for petitioners. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit