§

Romar Refuse Removal

314 N.L.R.B. 658 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Romar Refuse Removal

11 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.

    930 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 27 times
    Holding "federal administrative agencies are not bound by section 1738 because they are not ‘courts.’ "

  5. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware

    327 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that "[t]he fact of discharge . . . does not depend on the use of formal words of firing. It is sufficient if the words or actions of the employer 'would logically lead a prudent person to believe his tenure had been terminated.'"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. STATE OF FLA., DEPT. OF BUS. REG

    868 F.2d 391 (11th Cir. 1989)   Cited 2 times

    No. 88-3385. March 20, 1989. As Amended April 10, 1989. W. Douglas Moody, Jr., Dept. of Business Regulation, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendants-appellants. Susan Potter Norton, Donald T. Ryce, Jr., Coral Gables, Fla., for intervenor. Margery E. Lieber, Asst. Gen. Counsel for Special Litigation, NLRB, Corinna L. Metcalf, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida. Before RONEY, Chief Judge, HATCHETT, Circuit Judge, and

  8. Graves Trucking, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    692 F.2d 470 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-2467. Argued October 21, 1980. Decided November 1, 1982. John C. Theisen, Gallucci, Hopkins Theisen, Fort Wayne, Ind., for petitioner. Richard Michael Fischl, Elliott Moore, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge, and TEMPLAR, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge George Templar of the District of Kansas sitting by designation. FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit

  9. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"

  10. Peninsula Shipbuilders' Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    663 F.2d 488 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 81-1012, 81-1179 and 81-1412. Argued July 15, 1981. Decided September 21, 1981. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Eric Moskowitz, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Asst. Gen. Counsel for Special Litigation, W. Christian Schumann, Washington, D.C., on brief), for N.L.R.B. Deborah Crandall, Washington, D.C. (Andrew M. Kramer, Susan