§
Rolligon Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins

    317 U.S. 501 (1943)   Cited 315 times
    Holding it is the duty of the District Court to order production of evidence unless it is "plainly incompetent or irrelevant to any lawful purpose of the Secretary in the discharge of his duties under the Act."

  2. Lewis v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 10 (1958)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that the NLRB General Counsel is a "party" for purposes of issuing subpoenas

  3. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 56 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Frederick Cowan and Company

    522 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    Emphasizing that the primary requirement for enforcement is that the evidence or testimony relate to a matter under investigation or in question

  5. Service Emp. Intern. U., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    600 F.2d 930 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 77-1165, 77-1630. Argued June 8, 1978. Decided April 25, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 31, 1979. David A. Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in No. 77-1165 and intervenor in No. 77-1630. Robert V. Magor, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in No. 77-1630 and intervenor in No. 77-1165. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel

  6. Texaco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    462 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1972)   Cited 10 times

    No. 71-1281. Argued January 3, 1972. Decided May 4, 1972. Robert H. Kleeb, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner. Nancy Sherman, N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and JAMES ROSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT HASTIE, Circuit Judge. We here review an order of the National Labor Relations Board upon a petition of Texaco Inc. to set that order aside and a cross-application of the Board for