§

Rohr, Marion, Corporation

261 N.L.R.B. 971 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Rohr, Marion, Corporation

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. General Stencils, Inc.

    438 F.2d 894 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 38 times
    In General Stencils we compared and contrasted cases involving coercive interrogation, threats to close plants, discriminatory discharges, loss of benefits and the like, id. at 903, with the facts in General Stencils, which principally involved unlawful interrogation of one employee about his statement to a Board agent, coupled with threats to a few employees to withdraw benefits of a relatively minor nature.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    613 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that invitations to employees to disclose their union activities and sympathies constitute interrogation

  6. N.L.R.B. v. General Stencils, Inc.

    472 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 18 times
    Denying enforcement after Gissel remand

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Dadco Fashions, Inc.

    632 F.2d 493 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 6 times

    No. 79-3515. December 10, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington D.C., Carol A. De Deo, Penny Pilzer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kullman, Lang, Inman Bee, Ernest R. Malone, Jr., Michael S. Mitchell, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, AINSWORTH and GEE, Circuit Judges. AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order requiring

  8. Bausch Lomb Optical v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    217 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 13 times

    No. 36, Docket 23053. Argued October 5, 1954. Decided December 1, 1954. Arthur L. Stern, Rochester, N.Y. (Nixon, Hargrave, Devans Dey and Richard L. Turner, Rochester, N.Y., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before