§

Robinson Freight Lines

114 N.L.R.B. 1093 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Robinson Freight Lines

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand

    130 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1942)   Cited 51 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 919, 925, we held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. — which provides that a Master's findings stand unless clearly erroneous — would be applicable, by analogy, to findings of a Master appointed by a court of appeals.

  3. Ohio Ferro-Alloys v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    213 F.2d 646 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11943. June 17, 1954. Robert N. Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, John G. Ketterer, Day, Cope, Ketterer, Raley Wright, Canton, Ohio, on the brief, for petitioner. Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Thomas R. Haley, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for respondent. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corporation has petitioned this court to review a decision and order of the National Labor Relations

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indiana Desk Co.

    149 F.2d 987 (7th Cir. 1945)   Cited 16 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana Desk Co., 149 F.2d 987, 995, this court said, where a similar situation was involved: "The undisputed evidence discloses that the picketing was not conducted for the purpose of publicizing the strike or any grievance which the strikers had against respondent, or for the purpose of persuading the non-strikers to join the strikers or to refrain from going to work during the strike.

  5. Black Diamond S.S. Corp. v. Natl. Labor R. BD

    94 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 24 times
    In Black Diamond S. S. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 875, while an election was being held by the Board to determine which of two rival unions represented a majority of the men, one of the unions demanded that the company bargain with it.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Crosby Chemicals

    188 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times

    No. 13332. April 3, 1951. Richard C. Keenan, Chief Law Officer, National Labor Relations Bd., New Orleans, La., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., Allen R. LeCompte, DeRidder, La., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD, and BORAH, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lettie Lee

    140 F.2d 243 (9th Cir. 1944)   Cited 13 times

    No. 10382. January 29, 1944. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of the Board's order against Lettie Lee, Inc., wherein respondent sought annulment of the order. Order enforced. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose and Eleanor Schwartzbach, Attys. National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D