§

Robert E. Harding, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency). Appeal No. 01A03019 Agency No. HC-96-001 Hearing No. 100-98-7311X

01A03019 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 26, 2001)
Robert E. Harding, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency). Appeal No. 01A03019 Agency No. HC-96-001 Hearing No. 100-98-7311X

5 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 240,955 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,394 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,145 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  4. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  5. Section 1614.107 - Dismissals of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.107   Cited 477 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint